There is no historical figure — with the exception, perhaps, of Jesus Christ — whose legacy ideologues are keener to appropriate than that of Eric Blair, better known as George Orwell. The author of Animal Farm and 1984 is claimed by propagandists of the left and right as an ideological predecessor.

“Orwell’s legacy,” writes Lee Wengraf of the Socialist Worker, “Is our legacy.” On the other hand, Norman Podhoretz claimed back in 1986 that Orwell would have become neoconservative. Jeff Riggenbach of the Mises Institute suggests that while Orwell was “not… a libertarian as we understand the term today” he was the kind of leftist “few modern-day libertarians would have any trouble getting along with.” Quite a combination.

These disputes involve far more specific events. Last month, an argument on social media concerned the question of whether Orwell would have supported Antifa, with half the disputants insisting that he would have donned a black mask and punched Richard Spencer and half proclaiming that he would have stood up for the right of Americans to wear MAGA hats and post Pepe memes.

Why care? Well, people want to claim such a respected figure for their “side.” It gives their opinions the stamp of authority.

I have bad news. If by some miracle Orwell rose from his grave he would hate all our leading schools of thought. He would, indeed, dislike the modern world and disapprove of all of us.

He would be shocked — to be alive, of course, but also to be renowned. For most of his life he was neither rich nor famous; scribbling away for little magazines and publishers; living in small flats or windswept rural villages. He earned fame in the last months of his life, dying a tragic death because, in the words of Malcolm Muggeridge, “he passionately wanted to go on living.”

It might gladden Orwell to be alive, then, but I do not think he would be glad to make our acquaintance. Fascism and communism he abhorred, of course, denouncing Nazis, Soviets and all their fellow travellers. He fought against the Hitler-backed Francoists in Spain but loathed the thuggish Stalinist aspects of the Republicans. He was so ardently committed to the war against Nazism that he defended the bombing of German civilians, but so distrusted communists that he compiled a list of public figures that he thought might cherish Soviet loyalties.

Anti-communists have claimed Orwell as their own, along with Arthur Koestler and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, but conservatives and libertarians should not forget that when he wrote in “Why I Write” that all his work was directed against totalitarianism he added that it was directed towards socialism. The Orwell who immersed himself in working class life in Down and Out in Paris and London, scorned industrialization in Coming Up For Air and, reviewing Hayek’s classic Road to Serfdom, said “capitalism leads to dole queues, the scramble for markets, and war” would hate the inequality and commercialization of our age, and the people who would seem to him to be its propagandists.

Yet Orwell would not be impressed by the modern left. Their tolerance of Islamic authoritarianism would appall the man who said “freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” Their universalism would amuse him, as he thought “patriotism… stronger than any kind of internationalism.” Their cultural progressivism would embarrass an old-fashioned man who disliked “nancies,” “gutless” men, feminists, birth-control and vegetarians.

I suspect Orwell would feel unhappy in the modern world. It would please him that we have made economic and scientific progress (the tuberculosis that killed him, for example, is far rarer today) yet as someone who loved nature, solitude, and manual work he would hate our cities, motorways, and office-bound routines. Our garish cocktail-crammed bars are nothing like his idealized pub, the Moon Under Water. Our journalism is about as far from the rules he set down in “Politics and the English Language” as text could be.

My guess is that Orwell would have left for the countryside; finding some faraway cottage in Cumbria or Glencoe, writing books about the classics of English literature and detailing the wildlife in his diary.

This could be wrong. Who can know?

One thing I dislike about these arguments is that authors can be reduced to caricatures of their opinions. Orwell is anti-authority. Mill is pro-freedom. Burke is anti-revolution. How many of the people who have referenced these men have read “The Lion and the Unicorn,” On Liberty and Reflections on the Revolution in France? When our authors have the status of secular saints it devalues their work. They became mere totem poles dotted about our rhetoric.

Even people who know their Orwell, their Mill and their Burke should be wary. It is fun to speculate about what figures of the past would have made of our politics. It is also futile. What is more important than their personalities is their ideas, preserved in their literature.

It is our task to reinterpret those ideas for the present: appreciating the context in which they were formed yet acknowledging the different challenges of our conditions; explaining the importance of what is valuable and justifying our rejection of aspects we set aside.

As for what Orwell would think of Antifa? Well, I think he would look at Trump, and #TheResistance, and the alt-right, and the black bloc, and go for a drink. Considering these political peculiarities, perhaps even a cocktail.

If you enjoy our articles, be a part of our growth and help us produce more writing for you:


  1. A good article and a fair representation of Orwell’s thought and his unbending stance against totalitarianism in any form, but I disagree with the claim that a 21st century Orwell would be reduced to surly quietism. In ‘Why I Write’ Orwell states that ‘My starting point is always a feeling of partisanship, a sense of injustice. […] I write [books] because there is some lie I want to expose, some fact to which I want to draw attention, and my initial concern is to get a hearing.’ I think such principled attitudes are deeply innate to some people (for better or worse) and can’t easily be erased by circumstance. The real Orwell didn’t become a socialist thinker simply by oozing into some fashionable academic or literary milieu (indeed he made many enemies in those circles and it’s not hard to find major left academics of today who despise him); in fact he had to crawl there from the furthest possible place (that is, being an upper middle class boy, public school boy and then an imperial police officer in colonial Asia, which is about as un-proletarian a background as you can come up with). If he had the slightest desire to turn his back on the world then he could have wormed his way up the colonial hierarchy and lived off the sweat of the Burmese for all his days; certainly he had the option and ability.

  2. If Orwell looked at his Britain, and all Western Europe today, he’d see the process of Islamification and he’d despair, and all of it openly aided by the Modern Left who certainly do tolerate and enable Islamofacism, and have become so ridiculous they think Muslims are a minority despite numbering over a billion, and growing thanks to massive birth rates, and with over 50 nations under Islamic dominance.

    My own Israel has its own set of problems, but who would have thought that Britain, France, Sweden, Norway, Germany, Italy, Spain, Denmark, Belgium, The Netherlands, Australia, and increasingly Canada and America, in 2017, would have Muslim “grooming gangs”, operating on an industrial scale according to the police, social services, whistleblowers within and outside the Muslim community, journalists, and of course the victims and their families (“Oh it’s just a right wing fantasy, tolerance and diversity are more important!” cry the utterly insane Left). I’ve even witnessed feminists, absurdly popular and prominent on social media, telling child victims of these gangs that “white men rape too, stop talking about your experience, you’re Islamophobic”. I’m sickened by it all. The same nations also have halal slaughterhouses proven to be places of deliberate cruelty and with the halal industry under suspicion of funding terrorism and Islamic subversion of non Islamic nations, there are also tens of thousands of cases of FGM, forced marriage, racism and bigotry against non Muslims, cultural subversion on a grand scale, political fraud, and of course, terrorism – all from a culture that supposedly makes up no more than 10% of any of our nations, and allowing for the percent of Muslims who don’t participate in the worst of their culture and are mostly Westernized. That’s what the modern Left represent now, that’s the side they’ve chosen, that’s why the alt right is growing, that’s why nationalism is back on the menu, why Trump won, why people voted for Brexit, all to strike a blow at the globalists operating it all, and their Leftist converts, regardless of the outcome. Islam is not the only problem, the Left have given us a whole banquet of problems, despite my focus on Islam here.

    So I think Orwell would side with the people, not with the elite or the emasculated, Dhimmi Left. He’d probably understand the alt right more than any other group. He’d reject Nazism, sure, but the Nazis are not back, the Left dominated media are portraying people wearing MAGA hats, seeking moderate border control, or gathering in despair at the state of their nations, as the Nazi party reborn. It’s laughable from a Jewish viewpoint, despite being a natural liberal I can’t stomach the Left any more. I don’t think Orwell would see all this and retreat to a pub, not a man with his intelligence, I think he’d feel a fire rising inside at the madness forced on us all and he’d fight back.

  3. You are probably right. He clearly would have detested Trump. But he would absolutely have detested Antifa too, likely seeing them for the authoritarian ideologues they are. Like all the most interesting thinkers he could not be easily pigeonholed. He liked people and freedom, and neither left nor right have a monopoly on either.

  4. Who exactly are the”modern left”? Who is tolerant of Islamic authoritarianism? Apart from the USA government in the Middle East?

Leave a Reply