Geert Wilders: Enemy of Liberal Values, Symptom of Liberal Acquiescence to Religious Extremism

| by AR Devine |

Common sense has prevailed in Holland. The Dutch people have returned Mark Rutte of the center-Right People’s Party to power. Whatever the legitimate criticisms Wilders and his Freedom Party have with regards to Islamic extremism their supposed solutions are illiberal, divisive, and likely to lead to persecution of genuine moderate Muslims if they were ever to take power.

Wilder’s proposed ban on the Koran and the closing of all mosques violates two of liberalism’s most cherished principles: freedom of conscience and freedom of speech. Now, I am no fan of the Koran, I deeply oppose many of the moral precepts that it preaches, but I think it should be critiqued not banned. The only time it is permissible as a liberal to limit freedom of speech is if that speech directly promotes violence or harm to others as outlined by liberal philosopher John Stuart Mill in his harm principle.

If Wilders had called for a shutting down of Mosques that promote jihadi violence or that instruct its members to kill apostates (ex-Muslims) as radical mosques do, then he would have been acting consistent with liberal values. Instead, he chose to treat all Muslims in Holland as if they were Islamists who are seeking to impose sharia law on Holland and the rest of Europe. Of course, there is an Islamist threat in Holland, as there is across Europe, but lumping all Muslims in with the Islamists is counter-productive as it alienates the genuine secular moderate Muslims, as well as the peaceful social conservative Muslims who oppose the Islamists as much as secular liberals like myself do.

Wilders has opposed and denounced the secular liberal Muslim Mayor of Rotterdam, Ahmed Aboutaleb, a staunch defender of secular values who has told Muslim immigrants that they should integrate and respect European values such as freedom of speech. Just like Wilders, Ahmed Aboutaleb, has been on the receiving end of death threats from Islamists. Wilders should be allying himself with people like Ahmed Aboutaleb, but he is not doing so because as much as he is an opponent of Islam, he is also an ethnic nationalist who opposes anyone of a different ethnic origin becoming a Dutch citizen and holding political office in Holland. Wilders often claims he opposes Islam because he wants to defend liberal values, but if he was a true liberal he would be allying himself with liberal Muslims who are often a minority in their own community. The fact that he opposes men like Ahmed Aboutaleb, shows that he is much more concerned with keeping Holland ethnically pure than he is with promoting liberal values.

Ahmed Aboutaleb

Although I vehemently oppose Wilders and all ethnic nationalist parties they have arisen and grown in popularity because most of my fellow liberals, the mainstream political parties, and the media have for some time been reluctant to fully recognize and openly discuss that Muslim communities in the West have a far-Right problem of their own in the form of Islamism that needs to be faced down in the same way that Wilders and other ethnic nationalist groups need to be challenged. In fact, many so called liberals have attacked and condemned secular Muslims and ex-Muslims for opposing the far-Right in their own communities. They have even gone one step further and allied themselves with Islamic theocrats like Linda Sarsour, one of the organizers of the Women’s march against Donald Trump in the United States who has defended sharia law and Saudi Arabia. Surely this had to be the final nail hammered in to the coffin that contains the credibility of mainstream western feminism.

It is time for all of us who consider ourselves to be liberal to come forward and to ally ourselves with genuine moderate Muslims and ex-Muslim activists. If we don’t, the ethnic nationalists will grow in support every time there is a jihadi attack in Europe, or when a writer or cartoonist is threatened or killed simply for criticizing a religion. If liberals continue to refuse to oppose the Islamic far-Right and defend the values they purport to hold then they shouldn’t be surprised when the likes of Wilders and Le Pen continue to grow in popularity.


AR Devine is a writer and published author. He won the Orwell Prize in 2010 for his blog, “Working with the Underclass,” written under the nom de plume of Winston Smith. You can connect with him via email at



  1. Randy

    I think we ought to be consistent. In Canadian news today, an imam has called for the death of Jews. It’s not a hate crime, because he was merely endorsing Hadith. You can advocate any genocide you want, as long as its part of your religion’s holy texts.

    In my view, as long as advocating genocide is considered a hate crime, as it is generally in Canada, then any person promoting that material should be in prison. That would include anyone promoting the Bible.

    If religions find this offensive, there’s an easy solution… just change the text. Edit. Delete.


  2. Vijen

    Have you actually read the Koran? It clearly “directly promotes violence or harm to others” on almost every page. Even so, I don’t think banning it will improve the situation, but nor will your blatant apologetics.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s